GrantmakersCalifornia

Medtech Innovator

Los Angeles, CA · EIN 81-3132011. Reported 43 grants totalling $3,006,500 to 40 organizations across tax years 2019-2023, on Form 990 Schedule I.

40organizations funded
$25,000median reported grant
$3,006,500granted, 2019-2023
5%of grantees funded again the next year
12%of dollars to its largest recipient

Does this grantmaker accept applications?

Its tax return does not say, and we will not guess. Private foundations file Form 990-PF, which asks outright whether they fund only organizations they select themselves -- 78% say yes, and that one answer is what lets the rest of this site tell you which foundations are worth approaching. Grantmaking charities like this one file a regular Form 990 instead, and the IRS never puts the question to them. Anyone claiming to know the answer from the filing is inventing it.

Three things in the filing do bear on it:

  1. What kind of organization it is. For Medtech Innovator, the IRS classifies it under education rather than as a grantmaker (NTEE B90) -- it is an operating charity that also makes grants.
  2. How spread out its giving is. 40 distinct organizations, with 12% of the dollars going to the largest single recipient. That is genuinely spread out -- the mark of a funder making many independent decisions rather than underwriting one institution.
  3. How much its list changes. 5% of one year's grantees are funded again the next, across 4 year-to-year transitions. That is below the 57% median for grantmaking charities, and well below the 67% private foundations manage. A list that turns over this much is one a newcomer can realistically join.

How big are its grants?

The median reported grant is $25,000. Half of what it reported fell between $10,000 and $35,000; the smallest was $5,500 and the largest $350,000. If you are asking for materially more than the top of that range, you are asking the wrong organization.

Schedule I only reports grants over $5,000. Form 990 requires a charity to list recipients it paid more than that and lets it omit the rest, so every grant-size figure on this page describes the grants it reported, not all of them. Its real median is lower and its real recipient count is higher. This is also why these numbers cannot be compared with the private-foundation figures elsewhere on this site -- Form 990-PF has no reporting floor, so the two are different populations rather than two samples of one.
$5,000 - $10,000
3 grants
$10,000 - $25,000
18 grants
$25,000 - $50,000
14 grants
$100,000 - $250,000
2 grants
$250,000 Or More
6 grants

Every organization it funded

This is the complete list from its filings, largest first. Recipients are grouped by the EIN the filer reported, not by name, so an organization that was typed differently in two years appears once rather than twice.

OrganizationLocationTotal receivedGrantsYears fundedLast
Phiex TechnologiesBoston, MA$361,000222022
StrokedxPasadena, CA$360,500222023
Alva HealthNew Haven, CT$350,000112021
Forest DevicesPittsburgh, PA$350,000112019
RhaeosEvanston, IL$350,000112020
Gennext TechnologiesHalf Moon Bay, CA$250,000112022
Machine BioFountain Hills, AZ$200,000112021
MicrotransponderAustin, TX$200,000112023
Limax BiosciencesSomerville, MA$37,500112022
ImmersivetouchChicago, IL$35,000112023
Lief TherapeuticsSan Francisco, CA$35,000112020
Path ExHouston, TX$35,000112021
Alyve Medical IncDenver, CO$25,000112023
BiodevekAllston, MA$25,000112021
Cardiex USA (atcor Medical)Naperville, IL$25,000112023
Caretaker MedicalCharlottesville, VA$25,000112021
Cooler Heads CareSan Diego, CA$25,000112021
Ifpx MedicalIrvine, CA$25,000112023
Intermed Labs LLCMorgantown, WV$25,000112023
Koya IncSan Francisco, CA$25,000112019
Neurava IncWest Lafayette, IN$25,000112023
Project Moray IncBelmont, CA$25,000112020
EvoendoCentennial, CO$16,000222022
Clara BiotechLawrence, KS$15,000112021
Vena VitalsIrvine, CA$15,000112020
SafebeatChico, CA$12,500112022
Andson Biotech IncAtlanta, GA$10,000112023
Aopia Biosciences IncPleasanton, CA$10,000112023
Avisi Technologies IncPhiladelphia, PA$10,000112019
Cell ChorusHouston, TX$10,000112022
CelldomSan Carlos, CA$10,000112021
Drop GenieBoston, MA$10,000112022
EpicypherDurham, NC$10,000112021
Evren TechnologiesNewberry, FL$10,000112021
Glyphic BiotechnologiesSan Francisco, CA$10,000112021
Realseq BiosciencesSanta Cruz, CA$10,000112022
Reelreactor IncStar, ID$10,000112023
Sparta Biomedical IncMadison, NJ$10,000112023
NeurobionicsSomerville, MA$8,500112023
Junebrain IncBaltimore, MD$5,500112022

3 of 40 (8%) received money in more than one year over the 5 years we hold. Remember the $5,000 floor: an organization funded every year at $3,000 shows up here as never funded at all.

What the money was for

Taken verbatim from the purpose column of its filings, largest first. This is the closest thing to a statement of what it funds, in its own words.

Giving by year

Tax yearGrants reportedTotalMedian grant
20193$385,000$25,000
20204$425,000$30,000
202113$732,000$15,000
202210$706,000$10,250
202313$758,500$25,000

Tax years, not calendar years, and the most recent year is usually incomplete -- Form 990 arrives about a year after the year it covers, so a low final year means late paperwork rather than a grantmaker winding down.

Where its money goes

27% of its giving went to organizations in California. Community foundations and federated funds are usually the most geographically bounded funders there are -- being outside the footprint is normally disqualifying in a way that a weak programme fit is not.

California
$813K
Massachusetts
$442K
Illinois
$410K
Pennsylvania
$360K
Connecticut
$350K
Texas
$245K
Arizona
$200K
Colorado
$41K

Down to the city

Boston, MA
$371K
Pasadena, CA
$360K
New Haven, CT
$350K
Pittsburgh, PA
$350K
Evanston, IL
$350K
Half Moon Bay, CA
$250K

Find more funders like Medtech Innovator

We read newly filed IRS returns and email you the grantmakers whose giving matches your state and cause, as they are published. Free.

No spam, unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Funders that support the same organizations

These grantmakers and private foundations gave to organizations this one also funded. Shared grantees are the strongest signal available that two funders have overlapping priorities -- and a funder already backing your peers is a far warmer prospect than one that merely lists your cause.

Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium2 shared recipientsAdvanced Technology International2 shared recipients

How to approach this grantmaker

  1. Look for a published programme first. Unlike most private foundations, organizations of this kind often do run open, deadlined grant cycles with written guidelines. Its own website is the authority on that; this page is the authority on who it has actually paid.
  2. Check you are its size. The median reported grant is $25,000 -- and because grants under $5,000 need not be reported, it very likely writes smaller cheques than this page can see.
  3. Check you are in its geography. Its giving concentrates in California.
  4. Read the recipient list for organizations like yours. If nothing on it resembles your work, that is a real answer and a cheap one to get.

Where these numbers come from

Everything above is taken from Medtech Innovator's own Form 990 Schedule I filings, which the IRS publishes in bulk. We used 5 returns (tax years 2019-2023). Nothing here is scraped, inferred or estimated.

On its most recent return it told the IRS it made grants to 0 section 501(c)(3) organizations and 13 other organizations. That is the filer's own count for one year; the totals above cover every year we hold.

Address of record on the latest return: 907 Westwood Blvd 1067, Los Angeles, CA, 90024.

EIN 81-3132011 · See the original filings on ProPublica · How we build this

This is history, not an open call. Form 990 is published about a year after the tax year it covers. Nothing on this page is a deadline. It is a record of who this organization has actually funded, which is the best available predictor of who it will fund next.

Is something here wrong about your organization? Email [email protected] and we will correct it.